Understanding the functioning of the Planning Commission
This note is targeted at queries which arise while we conduct our courses with MPs on topics related to Economics, Budget and Governance.
India follows the 5-year Plan model and the Planning Commission is vested with the responsibility of formulating these plans.
1. What is the Planning Commission and who are the members?
2. How does it function? For example, how are allocations determined?
3. What are the common criticisms of its functioning?
Requested By- A first time MP from Tamil Nadu
Due date: March 20, 2008
Response
====================================================================================================
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF INDIA
INTRODUCTION
The Planning Commission of India is the premier governmental body in India that oversees economic development. The Planning Commission was set up by a Resolution of the Government of India in March 1950 in pursuance of declared objectives of the Government to promote a rapid rise in the standard of living of the people by efficient exploitation of the resources of the country, increasing production and offering opportunities to all for employment in the service of the community. Jawaharlal Nehru was the first Chairman of the Planning Commission.
The prime minister is the chairman of the Planning Commission, but the Commission is actually run by the deputy chairman (who enjoys the rank of Cabinet minister or minister of state, depending on his years in public life; for instance, K C Pant, deputy chairman during the NDA government, had the rank of Cabinet minister; Dr Montek Singh Ahluwalia too enjoys the status of a Cabinet minister), and members of the Commission.
Historical Development
- Origins of the present system lies in colonial-era legislation and administrative structures
- British period one of decentralization in concept but centralization in practice
- Current assignments and revenue-sharing arrangements based on pre-independence legislation (1935)
- Circumstances at independence (1947) led to centralizing features of India’s Constitution (1950)
- Considerable financial powers, and residual as well as overriding political powers, lie with Center vis-Ã -vis States
FUNCTIONS
The Planning Commission's functions as outlined by the government's 1950 resolution are:
- To make an assessment of the material, capital and human resources of the country, including technical personnel, and investigate the possibilities of augmenting such of these resources as are found to be deficient in relation to the nation's requirement.
- To formulate a plan for the most effective and balanced utilisation of country's resources.
- To define the stages, on a determination of priorities, in which the plan should be carried out and propose the allocation of resources for the due completion of each stage.
- To indicate the factors that tend to retard economic development.
- To determine the conditions which, in view of the current social and political situation, should be established for the successful execution of the plan.
- To determine the nature of the machinery that will be necessary for securing the successful implementation of each stage of the plan in all its aspects.
- To appraise from time to time the progress achieved in the execution of each stage of the plan and recommend the adjustments of policy and measures that such appraisal may show to be necessary.
- To make such interim or ancillary recommendations as appear to it to be appropriate either for facilitating the discharge of the duties assigned to it, or on a consideration of prevailing economic conditions, current policies, measures and development programmes or on an examination of such specific problems as may be referred to it for advice by central or state governments.
What are its other functions?
From a highly centralised planning system, the Indian economy is gradually moving towards indicative planning where the Planning Commission concerns itself with the building of a long-term strategic vision of the future and decide on priorities of nation. It works out sectoral targets and provides promotional stimulus to the economy to grow in the desired direction. The Planning Commission plays an integrative role in the development of a holistic approach to the policy formulation in critical areas of human and economic development. In the social sector, schemes that require coordination and synthesis like rural health, drinking water, rural energy needs, literacy and environment protection have yet to be subjected to coordinated policy formulation. It has led to multiplicity of agencies. An integrated approach can lead to better results at much lower costs. The Planning Commission functions through several divisions, each headed by a senior officer.
What does the Planning Commission focus on?
The Commission concentrates on maximising output by using our limited resources well. Instead of looking for mere increase in Plan outlays, the effort is to look for an increase in the efficiency of utilisation of the allocations being made. With the emergence of severe constraints on available budgetary resources, the resource allocation system between the states and Union ministries is under strain.
This requires the Commission to play a mediatory and facilitating role, keeping in view the best interest of all concerned. It has to ensure smooth management of change and help in creating a culture of high productivity and efficiency in government. The key to efficient utilisation of resources lies in the creation of appropriate self-managed organisations at all levels. In this area, the Planning Commission attempts to play a systems change role and provide consultancy within the government for developing better systems. In order to spread the gains of experience more widely, the Planning Commission also disseminates information.
ORGANIZATION
- Headed by the Prime Minister
- Works under the overall guidance of the National Development Council.
- Building of a long term strategic vision of the future and decide on priorities of nation. Works out sectoral targets and provides promotional stimulus
- Key function is the resource allocation system between the States and Ministries of the Central Government is under strain.
- Plays a mediatory and facilitating role,
- A systems change role and provide consultancy within the Government for developing better systems
Fiscal Review Council
- Analogous to the Trade Policy Review Mechanism of the WTO
- Interstate Council (ISC) would constitute itself into a Fiscal Review Council (FRC)
- meet regularly (e.g., once a year)
- review medium and long term fiscal policies of the state and center
- make recommendations
- Each state and the central government would submit to FRC
- its plan (specific tax and expenditure proposals) for achieving set revenue and fiscal deficit targets (based on FRBM legislations) as included in its annual budget
- its performance relative to the target in the previous fiscal year
- The FRC would seriously review the targets and performance and publish rankings
EVOLVING ROLE AND CONTEXT
- From a highly centralised planning system to more Indicative plan
- Formulates five-year plans and makes transfers in accordance with these plans
- Mix of grants and loans
- Constitutional underpinnings somewhat weak, under provision for miscellaneous transfers
- Political bargaining an important part of process of determination of transfers
- Formula is used for inter-state allocations
CENTRE-STATE TRANSFERS
- Finance Commission
- Constitutional authority to ‘decide’ center-state transfers, mainly tax-sharing
- Planning Commission
- Makes grants and loans for ‘development’ purposes
- Central Ministries
- Project-based, specific purpose grants to states
- Loans and Guarantees
FORMULAE for Distributing State Plan Assistance
|
Criteria
|
Share in central plan assistance (%)
|
Share of grants and loans
|
Distribution criteria: general category states
|
|
A. Special category States
|
30
|
90:10
|
|
|
B. Non-special category States
(i) Population (1971)
(ii) Per capita income, of which
(a) According to the ‘deviation’ method covering only States with per capita income below the national average
(b) According to the `distance' method covering all non-special category states
(iii) Fiscal performance, of which
(a) Tax effort
(b) Fiscal management
(c) National objectives
(iv) Special problems
Total
|
70
|
30:70
|
60.0
25.0
20.0
5.0
7.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
7.5
100.0
|
CRITICISMS
- Formula is not well-grounded in economic principles, nor does it reflect clear objectives
- Formula is not coordinated with Finance Commission formula
- Makes conditional or specific-purpose transfers
- Overall process not coordinated with that of Finance Commissions
- Lack of clear process for evaluating investment needs and priorities
- Planning Commission transfers slightly reduce horizontal equity
Transfer System
- Center should take full responsibility for financing investment and operational costs of projects that have spillovers across states, regardless of who implements (center or state)
- Currently, centrally sponsored schemes (center provides partial funding for the project’s investment cost and for its operational cost for a limited period) leads to projects getting started and completed but not fully utilized
- Reconstitute the Planning Commission as a Fund for Public Investment (FPI) for both the center and states
- Share holders, state and central governments
- FPI would appraise proposed projects for economic and social returns as well as feasibility and soundness of proposed financing from
- the center or state’s own resources
- borrowing from domestic and foreign sources
- capital transfers from the center, if relevant
Five Year Plan
|
|
Duration
|
Remarks
|
|
First
|
1951-1956
|
Emphasis on irrigation, energy, agriculture, social services
|
|
Second
|
1956-1961
|
Focus on heavy industry, following the Mahalanobis Plan
|
|
Third
|
1961-1966
|
Focus on agriculture, interrupted by the Sino-Indian war. However, the Green Revolution made India self sufficient in food grains
|
|
Indo Pakistan Conflict
|
|
|
|
Annual Plans
|
1966 to 1969
|
Three annual plans
|
|
Fourth
|
1969-1974
|
Technological advancement; Nationalization of banks; Due to Indo-Pak war, many development goals were not met
|
|
Fifth
|
1974-1979
|
Employment, poverty alleviation and justice; During the period of Emergency; Continuing failure to meet targeted growth rate
|
|
Sixth
|
1980-1985
|
Beginning of economic liberalization; encouragement of innovation; greater awareness of family planning
|
|
Seventh
|
1985-1989
|
Continuing liberalization, increase in production of foodgrains, generating employment; 5.8% growth
|
|
Annual Plans
|
1989-92
|
Two annual plans; Political instability and foreign exchange crisis; unshackling the economy in a controlled manner
|
|
Eighth
|
1992-1997
|
Employment generation; Universalization of elementary education; India becomes a member of the World Trade Organization. Modernization of industries; 5.6% growth
|
|
Ninth
|
1997-2002
|
Movement towards indicative planning; focus on social sector issues
|
|
Tenth
|
2002-2007
|
|
Divisions in the Planning Commission
- Agriculture Division
- Backward Classes Division
- Communication & Information Division
- Development Policy Division
- Education Division
- Environment & Forest Division
- Financial Resources Division
- Health, Nutrition & Family Welfare Division
- Housing, Urban Development & Water Supply Division
- Industry & Minerals Division
- International Economic Division
- Infrastructure Division
- Labour, Employment and Manpower Division
- Multi-level Planning Division
- Monitoring Division
- Perspective Planning Division
- Programme Outcome & Response Monitoring Divison
|
- Plan Coordination Division
- Power & Energy Division
- Programme Evaluation Organisation
- Project Appraisal & Management Division
- Rural Development Division
- Science & Technology Division
- Social Development & Women’s Programme Division
- Social Welfare Division
- State Plans Division
- Transport Division
- Village & Small Enterprises Division
- Water Resources Division
- Administration & Services Division
- Other Units
- Border Area Development Programmes
- Socio-Economic Research Unit
- Western Ghat Development Programme
|
|
Office Memorandum: Changing the name of 'Village & Small Industries Division' to "Village & Small Enterprises Division" dated 8/3/04
|
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.